Don't Turn Back the Clock
A recent article published in The New York Times Magazine has been stirring up a lot of controversy about girls’ participation in sports. In “The Uneven Playing Field” author Michael Sokolove highlights the frequency of ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) injuries of girls, particularly in the sport of soccer. He traces the narrative of one particularly competitive Florida soccer player who has already endured two ACL operations and is driven to push herself harder despite previous injury. But this story has a subtext.
I was quite disturbed by how subtle the agenda of the article was. At one point the author explains the anecdotal increases in ACL injuries by saying, “It is part of a national trend in the wake of Title IX and the explosion of sports participation among girls and young women.” His lack of scientific evidence and reliance on hyperbole is troublesome. He even admits that “comprehensive statistics on total sports injuries are in short supply… for younger athletes, the numbers are less specific and less reliable.” The bias is further evidenced in the headline, which reads: “Everyone Wants Girls to Have As Many Opportunities in Sports as Boys. But Can We Live With the Greater Rate of Injuries They Suffer?” To suggest that young women need protection from their own choice to pursue athletics, quite simply, smacks of paternalism. And it’s even worse that it’s cloaked in concern.
I would never object to a story that sheds light on a problem for female athletes, and I do believe that there are physiological differences that affect women’s bodies and performance in sports—in both negative and positive ways. In fact, I believe we probably need to do more research in that area. That’s fine, let’s have that discussion and teach our girls how to be healthy and strong—and ultimately better athletes.
Here’s what I propose: Let’s counsel girls and their families about the risks and put more focus on injury prevention. Programs are already being developed to help girls strength train to prevent injury, such as the PEP program, develop by researchers in Santa Monica. This seems reasonable, unlike implying that women should refrain from sports solely because they might get hurt.
The New York Times Magazine has published this as a preview of a longer article due out in June. They have a choice to make: continue to let Sokolove make gigantic logical leaps or have a well-rounded discourse that includes a discussion of the benefits that sports offers girls. According to the Women’s Sports Foundation these include: A reduced risk of diabetes, depression, obesity, anxiety, low self-esteem, heart disease, breast cancer and osteoporosis.
How have sports impacted your life? What are your thoughts on this controversy? –Jeana Durst



